⚠️ Auto-extracted by Claude on 2026-05-09 — class-page MOC drafted from the R36 round close. Member-compound pages are individually verified; this MOC summarises across them. Verify before relying on cross-class quantitative claims.

Peptide therapeutics — 503A bulks-list cluster

This page is a navigational MOC over the 12 peptide-class compounds covered in R36 (May 2026). It does not duplicate per-compound facts — each compound has an atomic page in molecules/compounds/ carrying primary-source citations. This page provides the regulatory frame, class-level pharmacology, evidence-quality summary, and wikilinks to navigate the cluster.

The cluster is defined by a regulatory event: the FDA Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (PCAC) has been re-evaluating these substances for inclusion on the 503A bulk substances list across 2024–2026. PCAC voted against MK-677 in October 2024; the broader cluster remains under active review. Most clinic-grade telehealth peptide use was effectively halted by enforcement actions in this period.


The 12 compounds at a glance

CompoundClass (mechanism)Endogenous?Aging-relevant claimStrongest evidencehuman-evidence-level
BPC-157tissue-repair-peptidederived from gastric BPCtendon/ligament/GI healingpreclinical + small human pilots (n<30 prospective)limited
TB-500actin-regulatory-peptide (Tβ4 fragment)fragment of endogenous TMSB4Xwound healing / angiogenesispreclinical only; active metabolite Ac-LKKTE per Rahaman 2024preclinical-only
GHK-Cuextracellular-matrix-remodelingendogenous (plasma decline iconically cited but primary source = Pickart 1973 PhD thesis)collagen/elastin synthesis; wound healingstrong topical clinical; injectable preclinicallimited (topical only)
Epitalontelomerase-activation (claimed)synthetic AEDG; distinct from epithalamin (bovine extract)telomere lengthening; longevity (claim)Khavinson cohorts used epithalamin extract, not synthetic epitalonlimited
MOTS-cexercise-mimetic / mitohormesis-inducerendogenous (mtDNA 12S rRNA-encoded)mitochondrial-aging + metabolicLee 2015 Cell Metab + Reynolds 2021 Nat Commun (n=10 humans)preclinical-only
DSIPsleep-promoting-neuropeptide / HPA-axis-modulatorendogenous (rabbit thalamic isolation; human status partial)sleep efficiency / latencySchoenenberger 1977 PNAS + small 1980s-90s sleep RCTslimited
Dihexagrowth-factor-receptor-agonism / HGF-mimetic (RETRACTED PRIMARY)synthetic peptidomimeticsynaptogenesis / cognitionMcCoy 2013 surviving primary; Benoist 2014 mechanism paper RETRACTED; BDNF and donepezil comparison claims absent from any surviving primarynone
MK-677 (ibutamoren)growth-hormone-secretagogue / ghrelin-receptor-agonistnon-peptide small moleculesarcopenia / sleep / lean-massmultiple Phase 2/3 trials; Adunsky 2011 terminated early for CHF safety signalstrong (with safety caveats)
Melanotan IImelanocortin-receptor-agonistsynthetic α-MSH analogtanning / appetiteDorr 1996 Phase I (n=3); illicit-use case-series for AEslimited
KPVantimicrobial-peptide / anti-inflammatory (α-MSH 11-13)endogenous α-MSH C-terminal fragmentgut inflammation / colitisDalmasso 2008 Gastroenterology; Laroui 2010 nanoparticle deliverypreclinical-only
Semaxneurotrophin-induction / neuroprotective-peptidesynthetic ACTH(4-7) analogstroke recovery / cognitionRussian prescription drug; 22% infarct-volume reduction claim unverifiable in English literaturelimited
LL-37antimicrobial-peptide / membrane-permeabilizationendogenous (CAMP gene → hCAP-18 → LL-37 by PR3 cleavage)innate-immunity decline; wound healingSørensen 2001 mechanism + Miranda 2023 DFU RCT (n=25, granulation only — wound area NOT significant)limited

R36 round-close findings (verifier-derived)

The 13-page seed + verify pass surfaced an unusual concentration of fabricated or unverifiable marketing claims in this cluster. Each finding is documented on the relevant compound page; this MOC summarises for cross-class context.

Retracted or absent primary sources

  • Dihexa: the c-Met / HGF mimetic mechanism paper (Benoist 2014, J Pharmacol Exp Ther 10.1124/jpet.114.218735) is retracted (November 2014; Expression of Concern September 2021; erratum April 2025). The two iconic marketing claims — “more potent than BDNF” and “outperformed donepezil” — were verified by the wiki-verifier (full PDF read of McCoy 2013) to be absent from any surviving primary source. McCoy 2013’s discussion section explicitly states the donepezil comparison is planned future work. The c-Met mechanism itself was attributed in McCoy 2013 to “(Benoist, Kawas, Harding, unpublished data)” — meaning the mechanism was never published in a surviving paper even before the 2014 retraction.
  • Semax: the user-reported “22% infarct-volume reduction (2005 study)” claim was not locatable in PubMed or Crossref despite exhaustive search; the figure may originate from an inaccessible Russian-language gray-literature report. Tagged #gap/unsourced #gap/no-fulltext-access on the page.
  • Melanotan II: the user-reported “2021 melanoma incidence review” was not locatable after exhaustive search; the closest sources are case-report compilations (Habbema 2017, n=4 melanomas) and a qualitative user-experience study (Gilhooley 2021), neither of which is a melanoma-incidence review. Tagged #gap/unsourced.
  • GHK-Cu: the iconic “200→80 ng/mL plasma decline (age 20→60)” claim traced to Pickart 1973 UCSF PhD thesis (unpublished), not a peer-reviewed primary measurement study. Reviews in 2015 + 2018 cite the 1973 thesis as the underlying source. #gap/unsourced retained — claim is widely cited but not in peer-reviewed literature.

Disambiguation surfaced (Mode A)

  • Epitalon (synthetic AEDG tetrapeptide) ≠ Epithalamin (bovine pineal extract). The widely-cited 266-person mortality-reduction cohort (Khavinson/Morozov 2003, PMID 14523363) and the 12-year cardiovascular cohort (Korkushko 2006) both used epithalamin (bovine extract), NOT synthetic epitalon. Verifier confirmed via PubMed abstracts. The conflation is a peptide-clinic marketing pattern; the wiki page documents the distinction explicitly.
  • TB-500 (LKKTETQ fragment) ≠ full Thymosin β4 (43-aa TMSB4X). Many “TB-500” wound-healing claims in marketing actually derive from full-Tβ4 studies (e.g., Philp 2004) and don’t apply to the fragment. Rahaman 2024 found Ac-LKKTE (a metabolite) is the active species, not parent TB-500.
  • Melanotan II (cyclic, never approved) ≠ Melanotan I / afamelanotide / Scenesse (linear, FDA-approved 2019 for erythropoietic protoporphyria). Conflation is common.

Seeder-fabricated or imprecise outcomes (R33 lesson confirmed)

  • MK-677: Adunsky 2011 hip-fracture trial early termination due to congestive heart failure safety signal was missing from the seeder draft; verifier added. Authors concluded “unfavorable safety profile in this patient population.” Barzilai 2012 review’s “40-70% Ames/Snell dwarf” and “16% Igf1r-KO” lifespan percentages were attributed to the review but are not in its text — corrected to qualitative framing.
  • MOTS-c: Zempo 2021 conclusion was REVERSED in the seeder draft — wiki said m.1382A>C variant “enriched in centenarian cohorts in Japan”; the paper actually concludes the variant “is unlikely to be involved with exceptional longevity” (7.7% vs 7.5% C-allele frequency, n=27,527). Corrected to #gap/contradictory-evidence framing.
  • Semax: Dmitrieva 2010 neurotrophin claim included NT-4 and p75NTR — paper measures only BDNF/NGF/NT-3 and TrkA/TrkB/TrkC. Both removed.
  • DSIP: two distinct 1981 Schneider-Helmert papers (Experientia chronic-insomniacs vs IJCPTT healthy-volunteers) were conflated into one footnote; split into separate citations.
  • TB-500: two fabricated author lists (Esposito 2012 added “Geldof L” who isn’t on the paper; Yu 1993 added “Bhatt SN, Chen LB” who aren’t on the paper). Both corrected via Crossref.
  • MK-677: Svensson 1998 study design was misreported as crossover; it’s parallel-group. Age range was 18-40 vs actual 18-50.

Multiple DOI errors (canonical-source memory unreliable; R28 lesson confirmed)

Across the 12 compound pages, the verifier wave caught:

  • Singh 2013 DOI (LL-37): wrong DOI resolved to a cyanophage RNA polymerase paper; corrected via PubMed PMID lookup.
  • Pickart 1980 DOI (GHK-Cu): wrong DOI resolved to Keski-Oja sarcoma growth factors; corrected.
  • Zempo 2021 DOI (MOTS-c): typo aging.202593 → aging.202529 (different paper).
  • 4 PMID-only refs in MOTS-c (Woodhead, Yu, Zheng, Yoon) — three had wrong DOIs that returned 404 or wrong papers; corrected via PubMed/Europe PMC.
  • Zhang 2019 page numbers (LL-37): wrong page range; corrected via Crossref.

Class-level pharmacology

Why peptides are hard to develop into drugs

  • Enzymatic instability: most native peptides have plasma half-lives <30 min. Synthetic modifications (acetylation, cyclization, D-amino acids, polyethylene glycol conjugation) extend stability but alter pharmacology.
  • Oral bioavailability: typically <2% for native peptides due to gastric proteases and intestinal-barrier limits. Most members of this cluster require parenteral (SC, IM, IV, intranasal) administration. Notable exceptions: MK-677 (small molecule, oral bioavailable).
  • Manufacturing standards: telehealth-clinic-supplied peptides historically were not GMP-grade. Breindahl 2015 found 4.32–8.84 mg actual content vs 10 mg labelled in MT-II vials, with 4.1–5.9% impurities in 2/3 vials sampled. This is a class-wide concern.
  • Immunogenicity: protein-derived peptides can elicit anti-drug antibody responses; relevant for chronic dosing.

Common claimed mechanisms in this cluster

Mechanism classCompoundsEvidence quality
Anti-inflammatory (NF-κB / MAPK)KPV, BPC-157, GHK-CuKPV best-evidenced (Dalmasso 2008 IκBα kinetics); others mostly secondary
Wound healing / regenerativeBPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu, LL-37mixed; preclinical strong; human evidence thin
Neurotrophin / neuroprotectiveSemax, Dihexa, BPC-157thin (Dihexa retracted; Semax Russian-only)
Mitochondrial / metabolicMOTS-cLee 2015 + Reynolds 2021
AntimicrobialLL-37, KPVLL-37 broad; KPV narrow
SleepDSIP, MK-677DSIP small RCTs; MK-677 stage IV (young) / REM (older) increases
Hormone-axis modulationMK-677 (GH/IGF-1), Epitalon (melatonin/pineal claim), Melanotan II (melanocortin)MK-677 strong; others speculative or contested
Tanning / cosmesisMelanotan II (MC1R)Phase I tanning n=3; illicit-use AEs

Aging relevance — variable by compound

The strongest aging-relevance arguments in the cluster:

  1. MOTS-c — defensible. Mitochondrial-derived peptide, exercise-induced, Folate-AICAR-AMPK signalling, age-declining plasma levels. Hallmarks linked: mitochondrial-dysfunction + deregulated-nutrient-sensing.
  2. MK-677 — paradoxical. GH-IGF-1 axis stimulation is mechanistically opposite to canonical longevity (IGF-1 reduction extends lifespan in many models — Barzilai 2012). Short-term lean-mass + sleep benefits in older adults vs longevity-research preference for IGF-1 reduction is a substantive disagreement. Hallmarks linked: deregulated-nutrient-sensing + stem-cell-exhaustion.
  3. GHK-Cu — endogenous-decline-with-age narrative is widely cited but the primary-source plasma quantification is a 1973 unpublished PhD thesis. Topical clinical evidence solid; injectable preclinical only.
  4. Epitalon — telomerase-activation + longevity claims are the cluster’s marquee aging assertion, but the longevity-cohort evidence used the bovine extract (epithalamin), not the synthetic peptide.
  5. LL-37 — innate-immunity decline with aging is well-documented (Zhang 2019 dFB progenitor mechanism); therapeutic LL-37 hampered by host-cell toxicity at bactericidal doses.

The remaining seven compounds (BPC-157, TB-500, DSIP, Dihexa, Melanotan II, KPV, Semax) have no defensible aging-hallmark linkage with primary-source-grade evidence and carry hallmarks: [] in their frontmatter per the R36 wave-1 convention.


Regulatory status — FDA 503A bulks list

  • 2024-10: PCAC voted against adding MK-677 (ibutamoren) to the 503A bulks list.
  • 2025: enforcement actions effectively halted compounding-pharmacy distribution of most peptides in this cluster (BPC-157, TB-500, GHK-Cu, KPV, Semax, Epitalon, Dihexa, MT-II, MOTS-c, DSIP, LL-37).
  • 2026: PCAC reconsidering parts of the cluster under different leadership (the user-supplied context); independent confirmation of meeting outcomes pending.

The wiki does not endorse or discourage any of these substances. The compound pages document evidence quality and safety profiles per CLAUDE.md citation discipline; the regulatory state is a fact about the FDA process, not an evidence claim about the substances.


See also

  • intervention-classes — mechanism-class registry; new R36 classes added: tissue-repair-peptide, actin-regulatory-peptide, extracellular-matrix-remodeling, exercise-mimetic / mitohormesis-inducer, sleep-promoting-neuropeptide / HPA-axis-modulation, growth-factor-receptor-agonism / HGF-mimetic, growth-hormone-secretagogue / ghrelin-receptor-agonist, melanocortin-receptor-agonist, antimicrobial-peptide / membrane-permeabilization, neurotrophin-induction / neuroprotective-peptide
  • camp — CAMP gene / hCAP-18 protein page (parent of LL-37 compound)
  • finding-druggability — Open Targets workflow used to populate druggability-tier: on individual compound pages
  • integrating-clinical-trials — ClinicalTrials.gov v2 API workflow used for clinical-trials-active: counts

Knowledge gaps

  • TMSB4X parent protein page — needed for full TB-500 biology context. Surfaced in R36 wave 1; queued for follow-up round.
  • MOTS-c parent peptide page (molecules/proteins/mots-c-peptide.md per CLAUDE.md naming convention) — covers endogenous mtDNA-encoded biology distinct from therapeutic compound framing.
  • Receptor pages: GHSR (MK-677), MC1R/MC3R/MC4R/MC5R (Melanotan II), FPR2 (LL-37), c-Met/HGF (Dihexa — lower priority post-retraction). All implicit stubs from R36.
  • PCAC primary-source confirmation — all bulks-list claims attributed to user-supplied context; FDA meeting transcripts not independently confirmed at time of round close.

needs-canonical-id — several compounds lack ChEMBL or DrugBank entries (peptides commonly unindexed); maintain on per-compound pages. no-fulltext-access — Russian-language Khavinson + Gusev primary literature largely closed-access; many class claims rest on abstract-level verification only.